I always marvel at how some of my heroes remain so calm while pointing out how completely and utterly fubarred we are. And this cartoon, by the fantastic Marc Roberts, says it all…
About
Here, if you're bovvered, is a bit more about DT. https://dwighttowers.wordpress.com/about/Being a twit…
- Really good post on mental ability (and "disabled") people... and activism wp.me/pSyo3-1Qd 1 year ago
- Oslo Accords and Climate Accords – the ominous parallels wp.me/pSyo3-1Qb 2 years ago
- “Plant or muppet” is the WRONG question for social movements wp.me/pSyo3-1Q9 2 years ago
- Isis, Ebola and … Abba. 2014 as a trailer for the “End of Civilisation” movie… wp.me/pSyo3-1Q7 2 years ago
- Dwight returns; “Creative compartments” etc etc wp.me/pSyo3-1Q5 2 years ago
Recent Comments
-
Recent Posts
- Really good post on mental ability (and “disabled”) people… and activism
- Oslo Accords and Climate Accords – the ominous parallels
- “Plant or muppet” is the WRONG question for social movements
- Isis, Ebola and … Abba. 2014 as a trailer for the “End of Civilisation” movie…
- Dwight returns; “Creative compartments” etc etc
- academia activism a little self-knowledge apocalypse book review bureaucracy climate competence death economics fear feminism film review Financial Times framing googlebinge humour internet culture media narcissism natural world politics reading list religion reviews science technoscience tv review Uncategorized youtubes
- academics agentic deadlock Anger Australia Australian Financial Review aviation bourne bureaucracy campaign strategy Chris Hedges climate camp climate change Cognitive Humility cognitive limitations decruitment denial disasturbation Doctor Who ecological modernisation ego-fodder extinction facebook facilitation feminism fritterature Green Confucianism hegemony hubris hypocrisy Intelligence Japanese Nuclear Emergency johnnie moore journalism leadership leaving babylon making elephants tapdance Marc Roberts mastery versus control meetings mistakes movement-building nature newbies Noam Chomsky nulture pessimism politics procrastination psychology racism recruitment repertoires resilience rhizome Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal smugness smugosphere social capacity social capital social movements Stanovich strategy stupidity the onion the Pointlessness of Marching The Wire Tim Wise Tom Lehrer Transactional Analysis transruptive twitter Viz words xkcd zombie repertoire
Blogroll
Archives
- November 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- August 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- August 2008
- July 2007
All too true – and borne out when I’ve interviewed climate change academics and got to my favourite bit ‘ How do you feel about all this?’ Most seem genuinely surprised by the question, and most again dont seem to connect the reasonable reaction – sheer fear – to the data they present. A necessary function of objective research?
The risk of ‘contamination’ – that emotions betray, mislead etc while you are “doing science” carries over into what you think/feel about the implications of the work. I suppose we saw it best with the so-called nuclear strategists, who seemed to compete for who could keep the most dispassionate voice while talking about millions of crispy corpses (‘megadeaths’). I suppose talking about how distressing it all is puts your ‘brand’ (and future career progression/opportunity to do more of the science you love) under threat. So you keep those feelings far under wraps? Any scientists lurking want to comment (anonymously if needs be?!)